Grant Roy « elmtelligence

Home

Grant Roy

Porn relationship news

by cedric on Jul.09, 2009, under Brent Corrigan, Grant Roy, Zack Randall, derek riviero, the jarics

The Jarics renew their contract with Falcon and Zack and Derek end theirs. Well it seems that the whole monogamous thing with the Jaric’s has paid off with Falcon renewing their exclusive contract. That is really nice for them considering that they are both hotties and people seem to enjoy them working together. I guess that was not in the stars for Zack and Derek though. There was just to much hotness in that pairing anyway. It kind of makes you a little jealous and nauseous all at the same time to see two guys that hot together. Anyway this is porn we are talking about and the likely hood of a relationship lasting is seriously challenged. I can only hope for the best for those who are in relationships.

The truth is a relationship is hard enough without porn being involved. Just look around at your friends and see who are in relationships. With all of the speculation from gossip websites and that nefarious blogger who no one reads aside relationships are hard. With the high profile relationships of the likes of MJ taylor and Jason Pitt, the Jaric’s and Zack and Derek they are fodder for the gossip blogs. Funny that Derek thought that he had to make a public announcement about wanting to keep the break up quiet. To tell the truth does it really matter?

People fall in and out of love on a regular basis Brent and Grant, Benjamin Bradley and Ethan Reynolds (whatever happened to Ethan?) Ben is back with Roman Heart last I heard, Pierre Fitch and Ralph Woods for example. The world did not come to an end when they broke up and we all survived and they did not feel the need to put out a press release. Oh and by the way a press release that also speaks of all of the new projects that they have coming up in the near future. I personally think it is a bit funny that Derek thought that it was necessary to to release this video.

So I guess with youtube and Twitter and all of the other places that you can upload video you can make anything seem news worthy. I think I will do a video to announce that I don’t care.

This is elmysterio and I’m out

No tags Comments Off more...

The evidence that matters is inconclusive.

by cedric on Mar.06, 2009, under Brent Corrigan, Grant Roy, Harlow Cuadra, Joseph Kerekes, bryan kocis, murder trial

With the cameras that can not be confirmed and the lack of DNA evidence it really is no wonder that the prosecution is going all out to make it look like Harlow is a hardened criminal. The Beach tapes and the Crab catcher tapes were their big hope of getting Harlow but the truth is Joe and Harlow knew they were being recorded. What is really interesting is the motive for all of this. Joe and Harlow killed Bryan to work with Sean and Cobra Video was their main competition in the gay porn business. Now the settlement did not preclude Sean from working with anyone but Cobra models. The only one named specifically was Brent Everett.

The settlement did have a stipulation that Sean would pay Cobra Video 20% of his fee for the use of the name “Brent Corrigan”. Now the fact that Sean and Grant are claiming that they could not work with Joe and Harlow while they were in Las Vegas is strange because at the time there was no signed settlement. The settlement was not signed until the 18Th of January 2007. There were still issues with the settlement while they were in Las Vegas and they did not get ironed out until they were back in San Diego.

Also of note during the civil suit Sean and Grant said that the contract with Cobra could not be enforced. The contract in question that Sean breached would have expired in 2006 anyway. The civil suit was really about the name Brent Corrigan and nothing else. Bryan could not get that contract enforced because Sean could have fulfilled that contract by just showing up and that is all he had to do. You can not enforce a contract for sex, that would be prostitution and that is illegal. Also the production of pornographic material is illegal in the state of Pennsylvania.

Yet the prosecution is trying to use it as means for a conviction. They turned their back on the illegal activities of the victim until he was killed. All of a sudden he was a “business man” and he was killed so that someone could get his “prized actor”. Give me a break, this is such a sack of shit. It stinks just like all of the other illegal activity that that court house is famous for. The truth of the matter is that Luzerne County should have removed themselves from prosecuting this case.

They do not have a definite time of death for the victim and every time it is reported it is a different time frame. As far as I am concerned the time frame is between 7:50pm and 8:20 pm on January 24Th. Based on the last time someone spoke to the victim and the time that Amy saw the car leave the scene. That gives the killers 30 minutes to kill Bryan and clean up and loot the house and flee the scene with the items that they are accused of taking. Did the police check the drain traps for blood trace? The killer would have been covered in blood based on the way that the victim was killed. Did they check to see how much blood the victim had lost during the autopsy? Did they check stomach contents of the victim, he supposedly got some food that day.

The police did not find any DNA evidence in the victims house or in the SUV that was rented by Harlow. They can not prove that the video cameras were in fact those of the victim. To tell you the truth they can not really prove that Joe and Harlow were actually at the victims house. That has always been the case. There is a witness sighting of the SUV from earlier that evening but it could that have been the Recon mission. As the email stated that Harlow was not scheduled to arrive until 7:15 pm. So unless Harlow was early then Macias is mistaken about 6:30 being the time that the “model” arrived.

Bryan was not expecting him until 45 minutes later. Perhaps it was just Bryan taking another phone call. Macias did talk to Bryan at 7:50 pm so Bryan was still alive at that time. There are just to many unanswered questions. No real proof that Joe and Harlow were at Bryan’s house Just a vehicle that looked like the one Harlow rented. I wonder how many silver Nissan Exterra’s there are out there? Did anyone actually see Harlow or Joe at the crime scene?
Is the knife found at the scene the one that Joe and Harlow purchased in Virginia Beach?

Why slash his throat they has a gun they could have shot him. It is January, its cold no one would have any windows open and most houses would have had double pained windows. No one would have heard the gun shot if you used a pillow to muffle it. Why would two crazed killers call Sean and Grant and tell them that they just killed someone. They must have known that Sean and Grant would be blamed for it. Non of this makes any sense to me, it never has.

No tags 36 Comments more...

The Case Of The Big Ass

by cedric on Mar.03, 2009, under Brent Corrigan, Grant Roy, Harlow Cuadra, joe kerekes

Well this is funny Harlow is concerned about the size of his ass. It seems that a letter leaked to the press about Harlow and his fears about his image has made the rounds of the blogs today. With the Sword and Jim’s Silence of the chinchilla’s blog reporting on it. What is funny is that BB is alluding that I was the one who leaked this letter to the press. Now that is a total sack of shit if I ever heard one.

First of all I never heard of that letter secondly it was sent to Renee Martin whom BB claims sent it to Damon Kruezer and me. Now I don’t know about any of you but Damon would have posted that letter in a hot minute if he received it. I on the other hand never received such a letter. So I guess BB was wrong, imagine that BB being wrong about something. Then PC decides to chime in about me being a party to such a scheme. PC who is all cozy with Renee and BB is accusing me of this?

I think PC is just pissed off because I won’t take his shit and call it like I see it. I made a comment on my blog yesterday and it seemed to set off a firestorm of controversy. I find it funny that I was always assumed to be in Harlow’s corner in all of this but that was far from the truth. I wanted the truth to come out and that is really all that I wanted from the very start. So this latest bit of “news” is really funny to me.

The idea that it could cause a mistrial is as big a joke as is the actual trial. It is full of lies and fabrications and too many people trying to cover their asses from the truth especially Harlow and his huge ass. Sean and Grant have lied from the beginning about their involvement in this murder. And Joe and Harlow were stupid to get involved in other people’s drama. I know a little bit about that subject as I was all involved in this drama and I am no longer falling for anybody’s bullshit.

my ass looks huge in this picture

Is it Just me are does Harlow’s big ass make him look guilty?

No tags 14 Comments more...

At last the trial: part one

by cedric on Feb.25, 2009, under Brent Corrigan, Grant Roy, Harlow Cuadra, bryan kocis, murder trial

With the court house testimony under way it seems that the prosecution is going for blood. They are showing that this was a planned out methodical venture designed to get rid of Bryan Kocis who the defendent(s) deemed as direct competition to their gay porn business. The defense strategy is to place all of the blame on everyone but Harlow which I guess is what they should do. With Joe in prison for life and Harlow free to blame it all on him.

The prosecution has presented several witnesses who are truly making it appear that Harlow is not the sweet and innocent school boy his apperance suggests. As far the testimony of the coronor and the police officers they are stating facts that they have ascertained from the collection of evidence that was present at the crime scene. Most of which was destroyed by the fire from thier direct testimony.

Anderew Shunk testified that Joe and Harlow wanted to get Brent Corrigan to model for them because it would net them a big payday. He also testified that Harlow told him that Bryan Kocis was competition for their gay porn business. He also testified to the star power of Brent Corrigan, the prosecution refers to Brent Corrigan as the “Tom Cruise of gay porn” . Melnick also alluded to what was said at the Las Vegas dinner, He said that Joe and Harlow offered to kill Bryan for Sean and Grant.

The defense does not appear to have any strategy with regards to their cross-examinations on any of these witnesses so far though. I don’t really see any angle to the defense’s argument as of yet but this trial is just getting started. I guess we will just have to wait and see where they are going with this.

Now if you look at Andrew’s testimony it would appear that Brent Corrigan was the prize. Bryan stood in Joe and Harlow’s way of attaining of that prize. Hence the prosecutions premise that Bryan was in direct competition to them. There was also testimony offered to the subject matter discussed at the Las Vegas dinner that as far as we know there are two different versions of. The prosecution did not attend said dinner but they are using this as grounds for this murder. Now I don’t know about you but if you are going to kill someone do you tell someone who can testify against you about your plans?

There is also the testimony about how much Joe and Harlow were going to pay Brent Corrigan to do a couple of scenes. Andrew also testifies to the projected earning of the video scenes.

Now I have read the MOU and I don’t know all of the terms of the settlement but I do know that Brent was required to pay Bryan 20% for any work he did under the name Brent Corrigan. Now I really don’t know what Brent’s scene rate is but I would guess it is around $3000.00 per scene. So my question is why didn’t Brent take the $50,0000 and pay Bryan his share and be done with it.

That is the big question here, Bryan would be alive and Brent would be flush and Joe and Harlow would be happy. There is also the other question that I think needs to be answered why did Brent and Grant settle with Bryan. Bryan did not have a leg to stand on in the civil suit. It is a fact that Brent was under age when he worked on those first scenes for Cobra video. That is evident by the fact that they are no longer publicly available and by the fact that Brent’s age is no longer an issue. The settlement really makes no sense when you think about it. Brent walked away from Cobra Video in 2005 and he worked for Falcon studios as Fox Ryder. Bryan had no say in that endeavor.

Bryan did take out a trademark on the name Brent Corrigan but it was only in the state of Pennsylvania. The federal trademark had not been approved and to this day it still has not been approved. As far as the contract with Cobra Video goes it had no power to compel Brent to perform sex acts on film. No porn contract can compel a model to perform a sex act on film. The contract that Cobra had was useless in that aspect. So for the prosecution to claim that Brent Corrigan was under contract to Cobra video is a stupid mistake.